Threatened
Egotism
Jason
M. Hawes
The
Chicago School of Professional Psychology
The article titled “Violent Pride”
was very interesting. The connection between low self-esteem and aggression
seemed intriguing. When I first started reading the article I was surprised
that so many individuals with varying degrees of power over a child would worry
about criticizing them. According to the article their belief was that if they
negatively critique a child then they may cause the child to act out in
aggression.
Thus, low self-esteem is supposed to
be directly linked to violence. This theoretical perspective does seem to make
sense at first. One would think that if an individual had low self-esteem,
perhaps that person would have less to loose. That person would act out
violently without the loss of anything. The higher sense of self-worth that an
individual has, perhaps that person would not want to risk the loss of someone
without a sense of self-worth. We can look at social construct theory or the
value an individual holds in society. It seems to me that the more value an
individual assigns him or herself is directly correlated to the way he or she
is willing to conduct him or herself.
This article demonstrated that low self-esteem
theory is incongruent with what we have learned about self-esteem and
aggression. Threatened egotism is a new concept that was introduced in this
article. An individual’s ego can become threatened when someone else challenges
his or her own beliefs/values/morals/folkways/desires. Once challenged, the
individual may become aggressive due to the challenge. The article also
presented another interesting concept. An individual can also threaten his or
her own belief system/values. This can create aggression that may be directed
inward upon oneself or outward towards others. Once we pit ourselves against
our own values, we create an internal struggle. This struggle can manifest
itself into anger. This is exactly why self-help books have been proven to be
problematic, rather than an easy solution for the reader.
It was very thought provoking how
they conducted the research associated with aggression. It was astonishing how
the third party in the trial was not persecuted. I would have thought for sure
that the agitated individual would have misdirected his or her anger against
the stranger at hand. Instead, the research showed that the anger was directly
linked towards the individual he or she thought had given the negative
score/feedback.
Before reading this article I did
believe that self-esteem varied at times for individuals given certain life
events. I was surprised to read that research has shown that it stays
consistent without regard of whatever life throws at us. Life events still cause
our self-esteem to mildly fluctuate but we still remain stagnant with what we
originated with. This begs the question of how we look at our own self-concept
and the personal stories and ideations that we carry.
I also found it interesting that men
have a higher level of self-esteem than women. I would have been very
interested in reading the author’s perspective on the reasoning behind this. I
believe as a society, we hold men to a hierarchy in life. Women fall below men
still in our society and are rated as a large category to be less aggressive.
It would have been very interesting if the author looked at the gender biases
that each sex lives up to. Men are breed to be aggressive so perhaps we have
created this behavior socially rather than the behavior being part of this
theory.
I do believe as this article suggested
that we hold dearly to our valued sense of identity. We are true to our own
beliefs regardless of the light others hold us in. We are quick to end our
lives once we feel there is maleficence in our own traits or expectations. The Chinese culture is a great example. They
hold each other accountable for such a grandeur of self-respect that if something
should go wrong, they cannot live another day due to the shame associated with
the loss of whatever has occurred.
References
Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Violent Pride. Scientific
American Mind, 17(4), 54-59. doi:
10.1038/scientificamericanmind0806-54
Hacker, D. (n.d.). Rules for Writers - Tabbed Edition. 6th
Edition. Retrieved May 20, 2012, from
http://www.valorebooks.com/textbooks/rules-for-writers-tabbed-edition-6th-edition/9780312485733
Hacker, D., Sommers, N. I., Jehn, T. R., Rosenzweig, J.,
& Carbajal, V. H. (2008). Rules for writers. Boston, MA:
Bedford/St. Martin's.
No comments:
Post a Comment